Electron-density analysis of halide · · · halide through-space magnetic exchange

Rebecca Scatenaa, Zachary E. Manson b, Jamie L. Manson b, David R. Allan a, Paul A. Goddard c and Roger D. Johnson d,e

aDiamond Light Source, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory–STFC, Chilton, Didcot OX11 0QX, United Kingdom; b Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Eastern Washington University, Cheney, Washington 99004, USA; c Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom d Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom e London Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
e-mail: roger.johnson@ucl.ac.uk

We present a combined experimental and density functional theory study that characterizes the charge and spin density in NiX2(3,5-lutidine)4 (X = Cl, Br and I). In this material, magnetic exchange interactions occur via Ni2+–halide … halide–Ni2+ pathways, forming one-dimensional chains. We find evidence for weak halide…halide covalency in the iodine system, which is greatly reduced when X = Br and is absent for X = Cl; this is consistent with the reported ‘switching-on’ of magnetic exchange in the larger-halide cases. Our results are benchmarked against density functional theory calculations on [NiHF2-(pyrazine)2]SbF6, in which the primary magnetic exchange is mediated by F–H–F bridging ligands. This comparison indicates that, despite the largely depleted charge density found at the centre of halide…halide bonds, these through-space interactions can support strong magnetic exchange gated by weak covalency and enhanced by significant electron density overlapping that of the transition metal centres [1].

Results from the multipolar model for NiI2(3,5-lutidine)4 in terms of (a) charge density distribution, (b) static deformation density contour level where blue and red represent, respectively, the excess and depletion of electron density with respect to the spherical atom distribution, (c) Laplacian function of the charge density with positive contours drawn as solid blue lines indicating regions of charge concentration and negative contours shown as red dotted lines highlighting regions of charge depletion, and (d) highlight of the Laplacian in the Ni–I…I region.

References:

[1] R. Scatena et al., J. Appl. Cryst. (2025). 58, 363–373

Related Posts

Chemical Bonding - Everything a Chemist Wants to Know!?

The different concepts of chemical bonding are not only relevant for molecular chemistry, but also for us materials chemists dealing with extended solids.

Read More
AI can provide phases at 2 Å: Can Quantum Crystallography help us to a high-quality structure at this resolution?

AI can provide phases at 2 Å: Can Quantum Crystallography help us to a high-quality structure at this resolution?

By exploring the intersection of AI and quantum crystallography, we aim to spark a dialogue on how these fields can co-evolve to tackle the enduring challenges of structural determination in the low-resolution regime.

Read More

Dynamic quantum crystallography – is it possible to obtain accurate thermodynamic properties from X-ray data?

Anisotropic displacement parameters usually do not attract attention and are treated as a dustbin for all experimental errors (there are only few remarkable exceptions). However, when data quality is good enough and we enrich the analysis of thermal motion in crystals with information from periodic DFT calculations

Read More